216 RAILROAD ACCIDENTS.
CHAPTER XX.
THE BATTLE OF THE BRAKES.
THE English battle of the brakes may be said to have fairly
opened with the official report from Captain Tyler on the Shipton
accident, in reference to which he expressed the opinion, which
has already been quoted in describing the accident, that "if
the train had been fitted with continuous brakes throughout its
whole length there is no reason why it should not have been brought
to rest without any casuality." The Royal Commission on railroad
accidents then took the matter up and called for a series of scientifically
conducted experiments. These took place under the supervision
of two engineers appointed by the Commission, who were aided by
a detail of officers and men from the royal engineers. Eight brakes
competed, and a train, consisting of a locomotive and thirteen
cars, was specially prepared for each. With these trains some
seventy runs were made, and
THE NEWARK BRAKE TRIALS 217
their results recorded and tabulated; the experiments were
continued through six consecutive working days. Of the brakes
experimented with three were American in their origin,Westinghouse's
automatic and vacuum, and Smith's vacuum. The remainder were English,
and were steam, hydraulic, and air brakes; among them also was
one simple emergency brake. The result of the trials was a very
decided victory for the Westinghouse automatic, and upon its performances
the Commission based its conclusion that trains ought to be so
equipped that in cases of emergency they could be brought to rest,
when travelling on level ground at 50 miles an hour, within a
distance of 275 yards; with an allowance of distance in cases
of speed greater or less than 50 miles nearly proportioned to
its square. These allowances they tabulated as follows:
To appreciate the enormous advance in what may be called stopping
power which these experiments revealed, it should be added that
the first series of experiments made at Newark were with trains
equipped only with the hand-brake. The average
218 RAILROAD ACCIDENTS.
speed in these experiments was 47 miles, and with the train-brake,
according to the foregoing tabulation, the stop should have been
made in about 250 yards; in reality it was made in a little less
than five times that distance, or 1120 yards; in other words the
experiments showed that the improved appliances had more than
quadrupled the control over trains. It has already been noticed
that in the cases of the Angola and the Port Jervis disasters,
as well as in that at Shipton, the trains ran some 2,700 feet
before they could be stopped. Under the English tabulations above
given, in the results of which certain recent improvements do
not enter, a train running into the 42d Street Station in New
York, at a speed of forty-five miles an hour when under the entrance
arches, would be stopped before it reached the buffers at the
end of the covered tracks.
The Royal Commission experiments were followed in May and June,
1877, by yet others set on foot by the North Eastern Railway Company
for the purpose of making a competitive test of the Westinghouse
automatic and the Smith's vacuum brakes. At this trial also the
average stop at a speed of 50 miles an hour was effected in 15
seconds, and within a distance of 650 feet. Other series of experiments
with similar results were, about the same time, conducted under
the auspices of the Belgian and German governments, of which elaborate
official reports were made. The result was that at last, under
date
THE PERFECT TRAIN-BRAKE. 219
of August 30, 1877, the Board of Trade issued a circular to
the railway companies in which it called attention to the fact
that, notwithstanding all the discussion which had taken place
and the elaborate official trials which the government had set
on foot, there had "apparently been no attempt on the part
of the various companies to take the first step of agreeing upon
what are the requirements which, in their opinion, are essential
to a good continuous brake." In other words, the Board found
that, instead of becoming better, matters were rapidly becoming
worse. Each company was equipping its rolling stock with that
appliance in which its officers happened to be interested as owners
or inventors, and when carriages thus equipped passed from the
tracks of one road onto those of another the result was a return
to the old hand-brake system in a condition of impaired efficiency.
The Board accordingly now proceeded to narrow down the field of
selection by specifying the following as what it considered the
essentials of a good continuous brake:
a. "The brakes to be efficient in stopping trains, instantaneous
in their actions, and capable of being applied without difficulty
by engine-drivers or guards,
b. "In case of accident, to be instantaneously self-acting,
c. "The brakes to be put on and taken off (with facility)
on the engine and on every vehicle of a train,
d. "The brakes to be regularly used in daily working,
e. "The materials employed to be of a durable character,
so as to be easily maintained and kept in order."
220 RAILROAD ACCIDENTS.
These requirements pointed about as directly as they could
to the Westinghouse, to the exclusion of all competing brakes.
Not more than one other complied with them in all respects, and
many made no pretence of complying at all. Then followed what
may be termed the battle royal of the brakes, which as yet shows
no signs of drawing to a close. As the avowed object of the Board
of Trade was to introduce, one brake, to the necessary exclusion
of all others, throughout the railroad system of Great Britain,
the magnitude of the prize was not easy to over-estimate. The
weight of scientific and official authority was decidedly in favor
of the Westinghouse automatic, but among the railroad men the
Smith vacuum found the largest number of adherents. It failed
to meet three of the requirements of the Board of Trade, in that
it was neither automatic nor instantaneous in its action, while
the materials employed in it were not of a durable character.
It was, on the other hand, a brake of unquestioned excellence,
while it commended itself to the judgment of the average railroad
official by its simplicity, and to that of the average railroad
director by its apparent cheapness. Any one could understand it,
and its first cost was temptingly small. The real struggle in
Great Britain, therefore, has been, and now is, between these
two brakes; and the fact that both of them are American has been
made to enter largely into it, and in a way also which at times
lent to the discussion an element of broad humor.
THE BRITISH CONTROVERSIALIST. 221
For instance, the energetic agent of the Smith vacuum, feeling
himself aggrieved by some statement which appeared in the Times,
responded thereto in a circular, in the composition of which he
certainly evinced more zeal than either judgment or literary skill.
This circular and its author were then referred to by the editors
of Engineering, a London scientific journal, in the following
slightly de haut en bas style:
"It is not a little remarkable, and
it is a fact not harmonious with the feelings of English engineers,
that the two brakes recommending themselves for adoption are of
American origin. * * * Now we cannot wonder, considering what
our past experience has been in many of our dealings with Americans,
that this feeling of distrust and prejudice exists. it is not
merely sentimental, it is founded on many and untoward and costly
experiences of the past, and the fear of similar experiences in
the future. And when we see the representative of one of these
systems adopting the traditional policy of his country, and meeting
criticism with abuseabuse of men preeminent in the profession,
and journals which he apparently forgets are neither American
nor venalwe do not wonder that our railway engineers feel
a repugnance to commit themselves."
The superiority of the British over the American controversialist,
as respects courtesy and restraint in language, being thus satisfactorily
established, it only remained to illustrate it. This, however,
had already been done in the previous May; for at that time it
chanced that Captain Tyler, having retired from his position at
the head of the railway inspectors
222 RAILROAD ACCIDENTS.
department of the Board of Trade, was considering an offer
which Mr. Westinghouse had made him to associate himself with
the company owning the brakes known by that name. Before accepting
this offer, Captain Tyler took advantage of a meeting of the Society
of Arts to publicly give notice that he was considering it. This
he did in a really admirable paper on the whole subject of continuous
brakes, at the close of which a general discussion was invited
and took place, and in the course of it the innate superiority
of the British over any other kind of controversialist, so far
at least as courtesy and a delicate refraining from imputations
is concerned, received pointed illustration.
No sooner had Captain Tyler finished than Mr. Houghton, C.
E., took occasion to refer to the paper he had read as "an
elaborate puff to the Westinghouse brake, with which he [Tyler]
was, as he told, connected, or about to be." Subsequently
Mr. Steele proceeded to say that:
"On receiving the invitation to be
present at the meeting, he had been somewhat afraid that Captain
Tyler was going to lose his fine character for impartiality by
throwing in his lot with the brake-tinkers, but it came out that
not only was he going to do that, but actually going to be a partner
in a concern. * * * The speaker then proceeded to discuss the
Westinghouse brake, which he called the Westinghouse and Tyler
brake, designating it as a jack-in-the-box, a rattle trap, to
please and decoy, and not an invention at all. No engineer had
a hand in its manufacture. It was the discovery of some Philadelphia
barber or some such thing.
"A RATTLE-TRAP." 223
He had spoken of honest brakes. This was
a brake which had all sorts of pretensions. It had not worked
well, but whenever there was any row about its not working well,
they got the papers to praise it up, and that was how the papers
were under the thumb, and would not speak of any other. * * *
He thought it would not do for railway companies to take a bad
brake, and Captain Tyler and Mr. Westinghouse be able to make
their fortunes by floating a limited company for its introduction.
They had heard of Emma mines and Lisbon tramways, and such like,
and he felt it would not be well to stand by and allow this to
be done."
All of which was not only to the point, but finely calculated
to show the American inventors and agents who were present the
nice and mutually respectful manner in which such discussions
were carried on by all Englishmen.
Though the avowed adhesion of Sir Henry Tyler to the Westinghouse
was a most important move in the war of the brakes, it did not
prove a decisive one. The complete control of the field was too
valuable a property to be yielded in deference to that, or any
other name without a struggle; and, so to speak, there were altogether
too many ins and outs to the conflict. Back door influences had
everywhere to be encountered. The North Western, for instance,
is the most important of the railway companies of the United Kingdom.
The locomotive superintendent of that company was the part inventor
and proprietor of an emergency brake which had been extensively
adopted by it on its rolling stock, but which wholly failed to
meet the requirements
224 RAILROAD ACCIDENTS.
laid down in its circular by the Board of Trade. Immediately
after issuing that circular the Board of Trade called the attention
of the company to this fact in connection with an accident which
had recently occurred, and in very emphatic language pointed out
that the brakes in question could not "in any reasonable
sense of the word be called continuous brakes," and that
it was clear that the circular requirements were "not complied
with by the brake system of the London & North Western Railway
Company;" in case that company persisted in the use of that
brake, the secretary of the Board went on to say, "in the
event of a casualty occurring, which an efficient system of brakes
might have prevented, a heavy personal responsibility will rest
upon those who are answerable for such neglect." This was
certainly language tolerably direct in its import. As such it
was calculated to cause those to whom it was addressed to pause
in their action. The company, however, treated it with a superb
disregard, all the more contemptuous because veiled in language
of deferential civility. They then quietly went on applying their
locomotive superintendent's emergency brake to their equipment,
until on the 30th of June, 1879, they returned no less than 2,052
carriages fitted with it; that being by far the largest number
returned by any one company in the United Kingdom.
A more direct challenge to the Board of Trade
A DIRECT CHALLENGE. 225
and to Parliament could not easily have been devised. To appreciate
how direct it was, it is necessary to bear in mind that in its
circular of August 30, 1877, in which the requirements of a satisfactory
train-brake were laid down, the Board of Trade threw out to the
companies the very significant hint, that they "would do
well to reflect that if a doubt should arise that from a conflict
of interest or opinion, or from any other cause, they [the companies]
are not exerting themselves, it is obvious that they will call
down upon themselves an interference which the Board of Trade,
no less than the companies, desire to avoid." In his general
report on the accidents of the year 1877, the successor of Captain
Tyler expressed the opinion that "sufficient information
and experience would now appear to be available, and the time
is approaching when the railway companies may fairly be expected
to come to a decision as to which of the systems of continuous
brakes is best calculated to fulfil the requisite conditions,
and is most worthy of general adoption." At the close of
another year, however, the official returns seemed to indicate
that, while but a sixth part of the passenger locomotives and
a fifth part of the carriages in use on the railroads of the United
Kingdom were yet equipped with continuous brakes at all, a concurrence
of opinion in favor of any one system was more remote than ever.
During the six months ending December 31, 1878, but 127 additional
locomotives out of
226 RAILROAD ACCIDENTS.
about 4000, and 1,200 additional carriages out of some 32,000
were equipped; of which 70 locomotives and 530 carriages had been
equipped with the Smith vacuum, which in three most important
respects failed to comply with the Board of Trade requirements.
Under these circumstances the Board of Trade was obviously called
upon either to withdraw from the position it had taken, or to
invite that "interference" in its support to which in
its circular of August, 1877 it had so portentously referred.
It decided to do the latter"' and in March, 1879 the government
gave an intimation in the House of Lords that early Parliamentary
action was contemplated. As it is expressed, the railway companies
are to "be relieved of their indecision."
In Great Britain, therefore, the long battle of the brakes
would seem to be drawing to its close. The final struggle, however,
will be a spirited one, and one which Americans will watch with
considerable interest,for it is in fact a struggle between
two American brakes, the Westinghouse and the Smith vacuum. Of
the 907 locomotives hitherto equipped with the continuous brakes
no less than 81g are equipped with one or the other of these American
patents, besides over 4,464 of the 9,919 passenger carriages.
The remaining 3,857 locomotives and 30,000 carriages are
the prize of victory. As the score now stands the vacuum brake
is in almost exactly twice the use of its more scientific rival.
THE BALANCE OF ADVANTAGES. 227
The weight of authority and experience, and the requirements
of the Board of Trade, are, however, on the opposite side.
As deduced from the European scientific tests and the official
returns, the balance of advantages would seem to be as follows:In
favor of the vacuum are its superficial simplicity, and possible
economy in first cost :In favor of the Westinghouse automatic
are its superior quickness in application, the greater rapidity
in its stopping power, the more durable nature of its materials,
the smaller cost in renewal, its less liability to derangement,
and above all its self-acting adjustment. The last is the point
upon which the final issue of the struggle must probably turn.
The use of any train-brake which is not automatic in its action,
as has already been pointed out, involves in the long run disaster,and
ultimate serious disaster. The mere fact that the brake is generally
so reliable,that ninety-nine times out of the hundred it
works perfectly,simply makes disaster certain by the fatal
confidence it inspires. Ninety-nine times in a hundred the brake
proves reliable;nine times in the remaining ten of the thousand,
in which it fails, a lucky chance averts disaster ;but the
thousandth time will assuredly come, as it did at Communipaw and
on the New York Elevated railway, and, much the worst of all yet,
at Wollaston. Soon or late the use of non-automatic continuous
brakes will most assuredly, if they are not sooner abandoned,
be put an end to
228 RAILROAD ACCIDENTS.
by the occurrence of some not-to-be forgotten catastrophe of
the first magnitude, distinctly traceable to that cause. Meanwhile
that automatic brakes are complicated and sometimes cause inconvenience
in their operation is most indisputable. This is an objection,
also, to which they are open in common with most of the riper
results of human ingenuity;but, though sun-dials are charmingly
simple, we do not, therefore, discard chronometers in their favor;
neither do we insist on cutting our harvests with the scythe,
because every man who may be called upon to drive a mowing machine
may not know how to put one together. But what Sir Henry Tyler
has said in respect to this oldest and most fallacious, as well
as most wearisome, of objections covers the whole ground and cannot
be improved upon. After referring to the fact that simplicity
in construction and simplicity in working were two different things,
and that, almost invariably, a certain degree of complication
in construction is necessary to secure simplicity in working,after
pointing this out he went on to add that,
"Simplicity as regards the application of railway brakes
is not obtained by the system now more commonly employed of brake-handles
to be turned by different men in different parts of the train;
but is obtained when, by more complicated construction an engine-driver
is able easily in an instant to apply ample brake-power at pleasure
with more or less force to every wheel of his train is obtained
when, every time an engine-driver starts, or attempts to start
his train, the brake itself informs him if
TRUE SIMPLICITY DEFINED. 229
it is out of order; and is still more obtained when, on the
occasion of an accident and the separation of a coupling, the
brakes will unfailingly apply themselves on every wheel of the
train without the action of the engine-driver or guards, [brakemen],
and before even they have time to realize the necessity for it.
This is true simplicity in such a case, and that system of continuous
brakes which best accomplishes such results in the shortest space
of time is so far preferable to all others."
Table of Contents
| Contents Page
|